Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ewa Łączkowska's avatar

Hmm, a few aspects coming up for me... Not really coherent yet, so forgive the side-tracks.

First, I really expected you to end this with "things made with attention earn the attention of others" :P Which you kinda did!

But it's a more complex dynamics, I think - especially in our times of so much slop and everything trying to steal your attention, when the mainstream entertainment is basically treating the audiences like idiots. You see it especially within film, where scripts are written assuming the viewer scrolls social media on their phone while watching, so everything needs to be explained, multiple times over. And the audiences get used to the fact that nobody expects them to make a slightest of efforts. They also feel they aren't wasting their time (doing two things at one). But they are - ultimately paying attention to nothing and feeding the soul with "fast food". This kinda goes along with your point about "earning it" - make your thing nutritious. But then, what about audiences that got convinced they hate the bitter taste of salad, being fed with sugar all the time?

When I make things with attention, I kinda expect the audience to "earn it" by giving their *full* attention - and time - to it. I basically set the same standards for them as I do for me, and I won't make it any easier for them because we live in times of attention-crisis. I expect them to make an effort. I feel like this *is* me earning their attention. And it can often be disappointing.

In general, what you often see is this weird dynamics between you being you in your art/music (always the best thing to do, if done honestly), and trying to "earn" the attention of others by fulfilling certain expectations (not necessarily doing nutritious stuff). But if you truly do your best, and stay true to your expression in that, don't you have the right to expect others to also do their best? It's like with that example of conversation: both need to pay attention for it to work. Sure, you stay on the smalltalk level, but are we really here in our limited time (and attention) to stay on the surface?

I had to think about Umberto Eco, who starts "The Name of the Rose" with supremely boring, long historical essay (at least that's how I remember it from some 20 years ago). Whoever can get past that earned the right to enjoy the actual book. I understand it. I probably wouldn't do it, but I understand. You don't try to make everything accessible but set a certain bar for the audience instead. Does this count as earning the attention of others?

My strategy, I think, is making things with attention but also assuming that my audience has the capacity to give back. It's a two-way street.

Hopefully I didn't waste your time by making you read this slightly incoherent rumination on attention. ;)

Zac Hill's avatar

Dude this rules. I especially love the point about how as artists, we actually are accountable for conveying the gift of our audience’s attention *responsibly* - like being bequeathed it is a type of honor, something that merits stewardship.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?